1)ááá Boston Celtics (65-17) (low: 59 high: 68) á ThereÆs quite a difference between the highest and lowest possible amount of wins I have listed for this team isnÆt there? á The reasoning behind that is rather simple:the Celtics have more room for fluctuation than any other team in the NBA. And it's not very difficult to understand why. á With Kevin Garnett, the Celtics were head and shoulders better than the rest of the league in 2008 (in no small part due to the fact that the Lakers, their Finals opponent, were lacking two of their key components in Trevor Ariza and Andrew Bynum). However, without KG in the mix last year, the Celtics were pushed to the brink by a middling Chicago team and found themselves unable to even reach the Eastern Conference Finals. á With KG returning, ...
Read Full Article at Bleacher Report - NBA
Article written by Harrison Moore